The applicant should have provided appropriate methodology to deliver the research and impact programme. Therefore, you should not use journal impact factor (or any hierarchy of journals), conference rankings and metrics such as the H-index or i10-index when assessing UKRI grants. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. For multidisciplinary applications please state which aspects of the application you feel qualified to assess. The studentship should be provided via funding other than the New Investigator Award grant and may be drawn from the universitys doctoral training partnership or centres for doctoral training. NERC - the Natural Environment Research Council Swindon. It should cover the context, importance, methodology and all the associated work and activities you propose to carry out that will make this a high-quality research programme. Include how the research: Reviewers are requested to comment on the applicants ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: Appropriateness of the track record of the applicant(s): Balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators: Applicants are required to identify all resources required to undertake the project, and to clearly justify the request. If, in your judgement, it appears that the New Investigator Award is essentially to supplement the student project, this should be assigned a low score and treated as a flawed proposal. New Investigator Award. This is mainly assured by requiring that universities have in place and operate appropriate ethical approval processes. Multiple periods of PDRA supervision are likely to be considered holistically in terms of the skills the candidate has had the opportunity to develop, to avoid duplicating the aims of the NIA. CAREER "Utilization of Mechanochemistry for the Minimization of Solvent Waste" National Science . For the purpose of research assessment, please consider the value and impact of all research outputs (including datasets, software, inventions, patents, preprints and other commercial activities) in addition to research publications. EPSRC New Investigator Award for Dr Meghan Halse. Clinical research training fellowship. The expression of interest stage is mandatory. The NIA scheme aims to support individuals who hold an academic lectureship position (or equivalent) and have not previously led an academic research group or been the recipient of a significant grant. EPSRC recognises that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities and is committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career such as breaks and delays, disruptive working patterns and conditions, the loss of ongoing work, and role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic. Speaker: Dirk Husmeier. As impact should be an embedded activity in the research programme, you should also assess the suitability and appropriateness of the methodology to realise impact in the proposal. The proposal cover letter should also be used to highlight anything that has been discussed and agreed with EPSRC staff beforehand. Principal Investigator . For example, controlled sequences of cells in droplets with varied volumes is desirable in multi-volume droplet digital polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) for accurate detection of genetic information in cells. Your assessment should be based solely on the resources sought and not on the costs derived from them. In that case you should identify those aspects that you are able to comment on, and then give your review on just those aspects. Location White City Campus - Hybrid. Your application is assessed by peer review. Does the proposal specify routine and novel ways to engage end users or partners to help realise impacts? In the context of this call early career researchers are defined as those who are currently eligible to apply to, or have been eligible to apply to in the past eight years, EPSRC New Investigator Awards, First Grants, Early Career Fellowships, Career Acceleration Fellowships, Challenging Engineering and Healthcare Technology Challenge Awards. Total Price. Information on the portfolio is available through EPSRCs Grants on the Web (GoW). The work programme, maximum of one A4 side, should be illustrated with a simple diagrammatic work plan, such as a Programme Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) or Gantt chart. Applicants are asked to set their proposal in context in terms of the current state of knowledge and other work under way in the field. All costs will be funded at 80% of full economic costs. Sample Submission: 13 December 2023 Outline Deadline: 29 March 2023 Full Proposal Deadline: 13 June 2023 . Reviewers are requested to comment on the degree of research excellence of the proposal, making reference to three key aspects: Applicants are asked to set their proposal in context, in terms of the current state of knowledge and other work under way in the field. Equipment over 10,000 in value (including VAT) is not available through this funding opportunity. The panel will then use the information provided in the applications and the responses to the questions raised by the introducers to rank the proposals, using the assessment criteria, at a prioritisation panel meeting. Think of this as your report to the prioritisation panel, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses you identified in the individual questions and then making a clear and explicit recommendation about whether or not you believe the application warrants funding. an early career researcher who meets the eligibility requirements of EPSRC's New Investigator Award scheme. There is no page limit, but the statement should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. It might involve developing a commercial product or service, or creating a new technology, but it could also be about improved medical or healthcare, contributions to national planning or social policy or engaging the public in the outputs of research. We expect the proposed collaborative project to present a balance between partnership building activities and direct research, as appropriate, considering the key objectives of the funding opportunity. Your project should typically last one to three years. the project plan and management arrangements for impact, public engagement or responsible innovation, aspects of the project including timing, personnel, skills, budget, deliverables and feasibility, which should be appropriate and proportionate to the scale and complexity of the activity to be undertaken, whether there is clear responsibility for the delivery of each activity or task, whether appropriate resources to deliver the activities been requested and justified. whether the roles and responsibilities of all members of the team have been defined, including those of users or stakeholders in both research and impact activities. take the relative importance of identified impacts into account. However, they are not subject to the same eligibility restrictions as new . EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account - Funding Opportunity. Trusted research and innovation is a UKRI work programme designed to support cross-sector campaigns that protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector. EPSRC New Investigator Awards: Open to eligible researchers in any research area at any . UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks. Find out more about writing a justification of resources. The purpose of the New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme is to address a gap which has been identified in the funding landscape and support researchers in their transition to an independent research career. If, for any reason, you feel that you are not able to assess the application, please advise EPSRC accordingly. It is also assessed on applicant and partnerships (secondary), resources and management (secondary) and host organisation support (secondary). For example: applicant is on maternity leave until a certain . The grant value may include the cost of access to facilities (these funds are not awarded to the grant holding organisation). Grants are awarded under the standard UK Research and Innovation grant terms and conditions. You will not be able to apply after this time. covering letter describing how your experience and career history fit with the guidance on eligibility: not seen by peer review, no page limit. Not all questions carry equal weighting. You can save completed details in Je-S at any time and return to continue your application later. Your host organisations statement of support is important. Opportunity status: Upcoming Funders: Funding type: Fellowship Publication date: 27 January 2023 Opening date: 10 February 2023 9:00am UK time Closing date: 5 April 2023 4:00pm UK time Last updated: 27 January . The questions raised and answers will be compiled into a frequently asked questions document, which will be published shortly after the webinar. It is important that EPSRC funds are used ethically and responsibly. When adding a new proposal you should select: Your application should include the following attachments: You should attach your documents as PDFs to avoid errors. Applicants must comply with the standard EPSRC terms for eligibility to hold research grants . The assessment of the expert panel will be shared with you ahead of the prioritisation meeting. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 February 2020: Ends: 31 January 2022: Value (): 246,055: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Mathematical Analysis: EPSRC Industrial Sector Classifications: No relevance to Underpinning Sectors: Related Grants: . Where the applicants have ticked any boxes confirming that the application involves either animal research or human participation, then you are asked to comment specifically on any ethical considerations and particularly on whether ethical approval procedures have been complied with. In recent years, we have witnessed impressive developments in the mathematical modelling of complex physiological systems. Find out more about the new investigator award expectationsincluding what we are looking for and the support expected from your host organisation. Applicants have been advised that their applications should be based on the information available at the point of submission and, if applicable, the known application specific impacts of COVID-19 should be accounted for. The duration of the project should be appropriate to deliver these typically 1 to 3 years. Site is running on IP address 149.155.59.247, host name 149-155-59-247.uksbs.co.uk ( United Kingdom ) ping response time 10ms Excellent ping . Complete the intention to submit form on Smart Survey. Some funding opportunities may have specific requirements, which will be described in the funding opportunity. CVs are not required for principal or co-investigators on standard proposals, project partner letters of support where applicable, for all named project partners and no page limit, letters of support in exceptional circumstances a maximum of three letters with no page limit, equipment quotes where applicable with no page limit, equipment business case is required for any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000 maximum of two A4 sides, technical assessment for the use of a major facility where applicable and no page limit, host organisation statement for New Investigator Award applications and no page limit. Where you believe that there are less than three potential suppliers for an item you should explain this in the justification of resources. Flexible working includes, but is not limited to, reduction in full-time hours, long-term partial return to work, job sharing, compressed working hours, term-time only working, annualised hours. There are 2 parallel funding routes to this funding opportunity: The full economic cost of your project can be up to 200,000 with a duration of up to 2 years. Investigate high-priority use cases for exascale software - deadline 28th September 2021 (restrictions apply) Establish an international network in quantum technologies - deadline 30th September 2021. However applicants are not expected to work in isolation but will benefit from support from the university and the environment in which they will be working. 4.9/5. The UK is at the forefront of addressing global societal and economic challenges that have engineering and physical sciences at the heart, including climate change, cyber security and long-term sustainable growth. - Introduction-Tellthemtheoverallresearchgoal&convincethemyoucandeliverit. We will not accept uninvited resubmissions of projects that have been submitted to UKRI or any other funder. GTEs will connect directly with the wider Future Observatory: Design the Green Transition programme. Develop and integrate energy storage technologies at grid scale . Particularly with the increased pressures of COVID-19, EPSRC would like to stress to assessors that any cash or in kind support from the university for a grant is regarded as a benefit to building partnerships but is not expected to equate to cash or its equivalent (for example, provision of studentships, secondments, training and access to equipment). the applicant and wider teams ability to deliver the project through to the creation of impact. The best experts are ready to do your dissertation from scratch and guarantee the best result. Co-Is and PDRAs are permitted. EPSRC therefore allows applicants to tailor the support that they request in order to facilitate this. This will enhance UKRIs ability to report on overseas funding to: It includes any costs incurred by organisations outside the UK, including: The Other-DI Costs document is to contain the following data in the description box in this exact format: Organisation; Country; Cost Category; Cost Description. Before writing your application, look at some grant records on these pages to see what information would be in the public domain. There is no page limit, but letters should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. We encourage you to contact us first to discuss your proposal if you believe your research may cross research council boundaries. Requests for resources should be clearly articulated in the justification of resources section of the grant application. Note that the existence of competing groups elsewhere should not of itself be seen as a reason for downgrading a proposal. Complex, multifaceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. We will fund 80% of the full economic costs of your project. The new investigator award supports both theoretical and experimental research projects across EPSRCs remit. Other issues you might also comment on are the uniqueness (or otherwise) of the collaboration, the value of the contribution of the component you can judge, and the significance of this in terms of future potential development in your own field. EPSRC Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council : Start: 01-01-2022 / End: 31-12-2024 : Amount: 392,388: SEMS Division: Mechanical Engineering, Robotics and Design. Panels are organised by theme and meet at different times of the year. EPSRC Reference: EP/W028905/1: Title: Aviation-to-Grid: Grid flexibility through multiscale modelling and integration of power systems with electrified air transport . Projects made up of multiple proposals have additional guidance. There is no simple definition of excellence. contributes to, or helps maintain, the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges or contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry(s), complements other UK research already funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity. See the Je-S handbook for full advice on completing applications. F.D.G. Thus, how to . They should be completed in single-spaced Arial 11 font or similar-sized sans serif typeface. Find out more about the assessment process. Dr Meghan Halse has been awarded 210,439 from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) to support research on "Lighting up Magnetic Resonance: SABRE optimisation powered by in situ detection". how the research fits with and complements other UK research already funded in the area or related areas, including the relationship to the EPSRC portfolio and our stated strategy set out in our portfolio. National importance should also be a major consideration in making your assessment. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Please provide as full a response as you believe you are qualified to. comment explicitly on the viability of the arrangements described to access equipment needed for this project, and particularly on any university or third party contribution. yBirgit van Huijgevoort and Soe Haesaert are with the Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands zOliver Schon and sadegh Soudjani are with Newcastle University, United Kingdom Applicants can use the proposal cover letter to express any other information they feel is relevant to their application. Especially compelling examples come from Harmonic Analysis, which is the branch of . A project partner letter of support, from each project partner listed, must be included as an attachment. Index Alphabetical listing by name. Instead, they should describe the impacts on an individuals track record and career development. Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. Office of Research Services The NIA is an individual award which is intended to support the principal investigator in developing research independence, and the proposal should be developed accordingly. Last updated on 2023/02/23 If you plan to use a major facility in your research, such as those funded centrally by EPSRC or a European facility, contact the facility before applying to EPSRC to check if your proposed research is feasible, and obtain a technical assessment if Je-S marks it as required. F.D.G. case for support: eight pages two on your track record and six on the scientific case, CVs: up to two A4 sides each only for named postdoctoral staff, researcher- co-investigators (research assistants who have made a substantial contribution to the proposal and will be employed on the project for a significant amount of time), and visiting researchers, letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form: no page limit, quotes for equipment above 25,000: no page limit, equipment business case for any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000: up to two pages, technical assessment for the use of any major facilities listed in Je-S guidance: no page limit, a statement of support from your host research organisation: no page limit. EPSRC Reference: EP/V002260/1: . based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. Prompts are provided as a reminder of those issues that are likely to be most significant in determining the overall merit of an application. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be provided. When undertaking your assessment of the research project, you should assess the project as written, noting that any changes that the project might require in the future, which arise from the COVID-19 pandemic, will be resolved as a post-award issue by UKRI if the project is successful. This occurs when an organisation cannot be listed as a project partner, for example when the host institution wants to detail a proposed contribution to the cost of the equipment. You are asked to assess the application or report against a number of criteria. To find the opportunity, search for: NSF Global Centres. Nursing Management Business and Economics History +104. call/type/mode: Early Career Researchers International Collaboration Grants, case for support (8 pages, 2 on your track record and 6 on the scientific case). support for other adjustments and adaptations that may be needed due to the personal or health circumstances of the principal investigator or their team. You will be asked to provide the following information: You are not required to have finalised all the details of your application by the time the intention to submit is made. comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management, and on whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified. Industrial cooperative award in science and technology (CASE) studentship, early career researcher capital block grant, EPSRC studentship (through doctoral training partnerships or centres for doctoral training), information and communication technologies. The six levels of the scoring scale are as follows. You should comment on how clearly this is described, how appropriate it is for the planned activities, and their scientific and technical feasibility. We understand that in some research areas it might be more appropriate to request up to 35%, however anything above this would be more appropriate in standard mode. This funding opportunity has 2 parallel funding routes: This page details the requirements for the open funding route of the funding opportunity. Reference MED03699. These will be viewed against published applicant eligibility and project suitability guidance. A Publication of the . For any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000 a two-page equipment business case must also be included in the proposal documentation. Typical examples are the production of ammonia, which is a process that needs to be catalysed by iron, or the production . Thoroughly researched, expertly written, and styled accordingly. You are asked throughout to assess the application but be clear that this means the ideas, concepts and approaches contained therein, and not the specific form of the document itself. how the proposed research contributes to or helps maintain the health of other research disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges, contributes to current or future UK economic success or enables future development of key emerging industries, the extent to which the research proposed has the potential to meet national strategic needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading research activity (including areas of niche capability). The proposal cover letter should also be used to highlight anything that has been discussed and agreed with EPSRC staff beforehand. You should comment here on the adequacy and appropriateness of this proposed university contribution. epsrc new investigator award example. Text in embedded diagrams or pictures, numerical formulae or references can be smaller, as long as it is legible. This must be attached, as a single document, using the Case for Support attachment type in Je-S, justification of resources up to two A4 sides, CVs, up to two A4 sides each, for named research staff (including researcher co-investigators), or visiting researchers. Your host organisation will also be able to provide advice and guidance. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 October 2019: Ends: 30 September 2023: Value (): 280,530: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Catalysis & Applied Catalysis: Materials Characterisation: Materials Synthesis & Growth: . The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. Projects should be self-contained and comprise a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter - 964 . Please provide as full a response as you believe you are qualified to. Only a Ph.D. professional can handle such a comprehensive project as a dissertation. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 November 2022: Ends: 30 April 2025: Value (): 391,062: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Energy Storage: Sustainable Energy Networks . Customer Reviews. The content of a paper is more important than publication metrics or the identity of the journal in which it was published, especially for early-stage investigators.