Performance & security by Cloudflare. Either rejection or sending it out for review. Sovereignty - Wikipedia However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. independence from the authors and their institutions, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, currently or recently assessing related submissions. Cactus Communications. Thank you for visiting nature.com. 1124. No products in the cart. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. //-->Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev However, the Editor, in the rejection letter, provided an objective explanation for this long wait. Its been more than 2 months since I submitted my manuscript to a journal. At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. Proofs are cycled between Natures production staff, our typesetter and the author by means of an online production-tracking system. 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent . Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed To borrow a phrase that Bertolt Brecht originally wrote about science itself, the chief aim of our appeals process is not to open a door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error., Decisions, decisions. editor decision started nature How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and Thus it is not surprising that the first reaction to a rejection letter is often a sense that the editors must have made a mistake. Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. Dealing With a Negative Editorial Decision. [CDATA[// >Editorial process : Springer Support on 07 Apr, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. edit: so no. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. ii a. I gave them his address. Welcome to the Northern Ireland Assembly web site, which was set up to inform interested viewers of the day-to-day business and historical background of devolved Government in Northern Ireland. 5 Answers. Authors submitting to Nature do so on the understanding that they agree to these policies. It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? //--> Usually, the times vary from two to six months, but there is no fixed rule. editor decision started under consideration. Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. . How, when, and why you should appeal an editor's decision - Cell How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? [CDATA[> 'We regret to inform you'that your scientific manuscripts will be Internet Explorer). Nature (journal) - Wikipedia Determine why this decision will make a difference to your customers or fellow employees. edit: so no. Manuscript submitted exactly 2 months ago. ]]> Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) The reviewers only make recommendations. Peer review comments, cover letter and more. Sometimes they are more busy. Production The Journals and Editorial press office distributes embargoed mailings highlighting upcoming content to registered journalists six days in advance of publication. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. I submitted a MS to a Nature-Branded Journal on 9/10 and today the status changed to "Editor Decision Started". 771 BCE: Start of the Eastern Zhou dynasty (and the 'Spring and Autumn Annals' period) in China 753 BCE: The Founding of Rome 594 BCE: Solon is appointed archon of Athens and proposes popular reforms; a system of land taxation introduced in the state of Lu, China 575 BCE: Servius Tullius becomes King of Rome 560 BCE: Peisistratus seizes the Acropolis, makes himself tyrant of Athens, but is . In my experience rejection is quite rapid - 48 hours or so. Individuals often make decisions based on what they believe to be the historical purposes and goals of an institution. Experiments gone wrong? A final decision of acceptance or rejection of the revised manuscript is made by the editors as soon as they conclude that they have sufficient information at hand for doing so. Things just always take much longer than we think they would. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles If an author remains unsatisfied, he or she can write to the Editor, citing the manuscript reference number. Thank you for visiting nature.com. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Hi! I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . Should I write to the editor or wait for a response/change in status? How long does an editor decision take? - Studybuff 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned) 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration Either rejection or sending it out for review. editor decision started nature rejection - bobmarleypeace.com Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. Thus a successful appeal requires convincing the editors that the original decision was a serious mistake, not merely a borderline call that could have gone either way. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). The reviewing process may normally take from 4 to 10 weeks, although during the pandemic longer times are common. Cactus Communications. To obtain Your IP: How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. Stage 2: Editor assigned. How long should we wait if the current status of the manuscript is "Decision Started"? What the . All referees agree to Nature's conditions before Nature sends them a manuscript to assess. #AcademicChatter" What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. ISSN 1097-6256 (print). Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Yes, its appropriate. section 8 houses for rent in stockbridge, ga editor decision started nature rejection //-->Rejection, organisation and freedom: What it's really like being a In light of their advice, I am delighted to say that we can in principle offer to publish it in Nature, provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. Ellie Bergstrom, PhD on Twitter Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. Hello. No news is good news? the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. 2002 The above box-and-whisker plots show the days to decision for manuscripts submitted . 117. Often, Editors reject the manuscript because the analytical approach is not sufficiently rigorous, explicit and argued, or because the results are barely significant or representative. My paper has been in that state for over a month, but the editor let us know it was going out for peer review. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? All Rights Reserved. Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked.